Latest Developments


13/09/2019 Back To List


Special issue:

Q&A - Annexation: What happened and does it matter?

A PDF copy of that report can be downloded here.


Is This New? : To what extent does Netanyahu’s statement of September 10 differ from his pronouncement last April?

Netanyahu’s September 10th announcement (a week before the elections), closely  resembles a pronouncement he made three days before the April 9 elections, as in both statements, he made a commitment to extend Israel sovereignty to all settlements in the West Bank. Yet, there were three main distinctions:

1.    The specific reference to the Jordan Valley, to which he referred only indirectly in April.

2.    The timetable: In the September 10th announcement, he postponed the decision to annex the settlements until after the release of the Trump plan, and in full coordination with the US administration, whereas he committed to “apply Israeli sovereignty to the Jordan Valley and the northern Dead Sea “right after the establishment of a new government”. Consequently, and in contrast to his broader statement of April, Netanyahu appears to be more serious about his intentions and more specific about its scope by setting down timetable for implementation and by displaying a map of the areas to be annexed.

3.    There is now an explicit linkage between the decision to annex the settlements and the Trump plan.


The most significant distinction between the two announcements may well be yet to come. In both cases, the announcements are “declarations of intent” in which Netanyahu’s commitments are to be realized after the formation of a new government. Since he failed to form a coalition after the April elections, this promise was not put to the test. If he succeeds in forming a coalition with his natural right-wing and religious coalition partners, it will be.

If he indeed forms a government and does not carry out the annexation, this week’s announcement will prove, in retrospect, to be yet another hollow pre-election promise; if he does carry it out, it will have become the “gun put on the table in the first act, which is destined to be fired in the last act”.


How can it be carried out? Does annexation of Israeli settlements or of the Jordan Valley require Knesset legislation?

There has been much discussion in the press and among politicians that annexation will require lengthy deliberations in the Cabinet, and subsequently by the Knesset. There is no legal basis to this conclusion, and it is dangerous for those concerned about potential annexation to make that assumption.

The annexation of all or part of the West Bank requires NO Knesset legislation, as we can learn from the most relevant precedent: the annexation of East Jerusalem. The Law and Regulation Ordinance then empowered the Cabinet to apply ”the law, jurisdiction and administration of the State” in any area in what was British Mandate Palestine, by means of a Government order, adopted by a simple majority. This is precisely how East Jerusalem was annexed on June 28, 1967. Those asserting otherwise - i.e. Knesset approval is required - refer to two related matters. In 1980, the Knesset passed the Basic Law: Jerusalem the Capital of Israel. They wrongly claim that it was this legislation that constituted the act of annexation. However, that bill was of largely symbolic significance; the actual imposition of Israeli authority over East Jerusalem came well before, in 1967. In addition, they refer to the 1981 Knesset legislation annexing the Golan Heights. However, such legislation was necessary only because the Law and Regulation Ordinance does not apply to the Golan Heights, it being outside the borders of Mandatory Palestine.

The language of the Government decision by which East Jerusalem was annexed and that was used in the Knesset legislation annexing the Golan Heights are identical, and clearly express what is actually entailed in de jure annexation. Both stipulate that: “The law, jurisdiction and administration of the State shall apply…” to the area in question.

The Law and Regulation Ordinance is still on the books. Consequently, if the next Government issues an order “applying the law, jurisdiction and administration of Israel” to any or all of the West Bank, including but not limited to the Jordan River Valley, that will constitute annexation of the designated area. There will be no trip-wire, no advanced warning.


Why not immediately? Why postpone the decision to after the elections?

If Netanyahu could have carried out the annexation immediately by means of government fiat, why has it been deferred, at the very least, until the formation of the next Netanyahu government (should such a government be formed)?

There are three possible answers to that question - legal, political and diplomatic, the political considerations been the prevailing ones.

1.    Legal considerations - While the Government indeed has the authority to carry out the annexation, it is highly likely that any such move made by an interim Government on the eve of an election would be nullified by the High Court of Justice. 

There is a precedent indicating that this is indeed the case: 

In 1999, a week before the elections, Netanyahu trailed in the polls behind Barak. As today, he made a last minute attempt to consolidate his base, by issuing an order to close the Orient House, the PLO headquarters in East Jerusalem. There were dire warnings, including from Israeli security authorities, that this step could lead to an outbreak of violence.

A group of prominent Israelis, (represented by the author of this report), filed suit to the High Court of Justice, challenging the legality of the order. The appellants conceded that a) the government had the authority to close the Orient House, and b) that it could not be ruled out that some of the activities there were illegal. However, they argued that such momentous decisions could not be made in the shadow of elections and, quite possibly, on the basis of electoral considerations. The appellants argued that only an order handed down after due deliberation AFTER the elections would be legally valid. The Supreme Court issued a temporary injunction, preventing Netanyahu from shutting down the Orient House (it was ultimately shuttered by PM Sharon in 2001, after the outbreak of the second Intifada).

Netanyahu has indeed asserted that he sought to carry out the annexation immediately, but that the Attorney General would not let him to do so before an election. The Ministry of Justice denied Netanyahu’s claim and conveyed that, under urgent circumstances, justified by a favorable diplomatic context, immediate annexation could be legal. There are more than modest elements of posturing in both of these positions.

It is important to note: an order handed down by the next Netanyahu government, should there be one, will not, in all likelihood, be invalidated by the Court.


2.  Political considerations - Ahead of the elections, Netanyahu needs the announcement more than its implementation. It serves his purposes in two ways/ First, it enables him to take votes from his right-wing rivals, in an attempt to secure the number of seats he needs in order to be tasked to form the next Government. Secondly, he does not want to waste the valuable “asset” of annexation during the election campaign, since he will likely need it after the elections, for far more compelling reasons. Should Netanyahu receive a mandate to form the next Government and attempt to form a right-wing coalition, that coalition will likely be based on one overarching deal: granting his far-right coalition partners all they wish, including annexation, in exchange for immunity from prosecution. One legal scholar, Prof. Yuval Shany, has suggested that towards this end, Netanyahu will likely seek Knesset approval (even if it is not required) in order to create the fanfare that will maximize the impact of the public annexation.

If Netanyahu indeed succeeds in forming a right-wing coalition, the prospect of annexation being carried out is very real. Under all other circumstances (e.g. a Likud-Blue White-Israel Beitenu coalition), annexation will play a lesser role in the negotiations to form a government, and its implementation will be far less likely. Still, given the statement of Blue White’s leaders in reaction to Netanyahu’s announcement, which displays sympathy to partial annexation, that prospect will not entirely disappear.


3.  Diplomatic considerations - Netanyahu may well be inviting international pressure to stop him. Netanyahu has long opposed de jure annexation, fearing that de jure annexation would likely jeopardize the de facto annexation which has been the very core of his policies in the West Bank. As he is not unconcerned about the prospect of possible proceedings before the International Criminal Court, the total rescission of the Oslo Agreements, including of Israeli-Palestinian security coordination, and potential Israeli isolation, his message may well be a call to the international community to hold him back.


Does this Matter? Isn’t there already de facto annexation of the West Bank?

Many have been arguing that there is no real significance to formal annexation, because on the ground, de facto annexation - the application of Israeli law to the settlers and the settlements - already exists. For some, this conveniently provides a reason (or an excuse) not to strongly challenge Netanyahu over this; for others, it reflects their abandonment of the two-state paradigm.

Even though there is indeed much credence to the claim that de facto annexation is already operational, this position grossly underestimates the dire and far-reaching ramifications that will derive from de jure annexation:

1.    Unilateral Finality instead of a Negotiated Settlement - Occupation by its very nature is temporary, and international law pertaining to occupation is geared to temporarily govern the rules of engagement between the occupier and the occupied until agreement is reached.  Even 52 years after the onset of Israeli occupation, this principle - even if it has become in many ways a thinly veiled fiction - has been upheld by the international community.

By annexing, Israel will formally and unequivocally declare: these territories are not for negotiations; the current reality is permanent. Insofar as the annexation will not (at this stage) apply to Areas A and B or to the Palestinians in Area C, it will no longer be possible to assert that Israeli policies in the West Bank are provisional, and the comparison of Israel to an Apartheid regime will become virtually inevitable. 

It goes without saying that annexation would be yet another nail in the coffin of the two-state paradigm, if not its death certificate.

2.    Annexation will be a stark violation of international law. The issue of Israel-Palestine is not unique: the post WWII world order is being challenged as never before, and contempt for international law is on the ascendancy. Such a wanton violation of the law will destroy the remnants of the international consensus on how to move towards a resolution of this conflict. The fragmentation of that consensus is indeed not merely one of the prices paid for annexation, but one of its prominent features.

Just as the move of the US Embassy is supposed to “take Jerusalem off the table”, and defunding UNRWA is supposed to obviate the necessity of dealing with the refugee problem, annexation aspires to create “the new normal”. The contours of that new normal have been articulated by Jason Greenblatt in his recent  speech to the UNSC: international law, international consensus and UN resolutions are irrelevant in regard to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict; Israel has rights while the Palestinians have “aspirations”; the West Bank is not occupied, but disputed. And Israel has unilaterally elected to “settle” that dispute through annexation.

3.    Annexation is the ultimate breach of the Oslo Accord, its letter and spirit. The Oslo accords determined that the issue of borders is a permanent status issue to be resolved through negotiations. Violating that provision will likely lead the Palestinians to respond by abandoning their own obligations under the Oslo Accords, primarily, but not exclusively, security cooperation with Israel.

4.    A highly destabilizing move - Such a dramatic collapse of the Oslo Accords without any alternative to them on the horizon itself will be destabilizing. The hopelessness this will generate could well lead to the collapse of the Palestinian Authority, the outbreak of widespread violence, or both. There have been prominent members of Israel’s policy community who have sounded this warning, and reportedly, the Israeli security and intelligence community expressed these concerns to Netanyahu when he told them of his intentions, immediately before the annexation announcement.


What Can Be Done?

There has been a long-established custom whereby Israel’s friends in the international community refrain from raising issues relating to the conflict during an election cycle, not only for fear of being accused of meddling, but a belief that any mention of the Palestinians will encourage a siege mentality and be counter-productive. However, maintaining silence in the face of annexation is unconscionable, even now, on the eve of elections.

1.  It is abundantly evident that Netanyahu is using the issue of annexation as an electoral ploy. It is part of a broader campaign message, whereby under Netanyahu, the world will ultimately acquiesce, and the Palestinians submit, to permanent Israeli control over the West Bank. Netanyahu has successfully enlisted the support of Trump, Putin and some European leaders, among else, to prove as much to the Israeli public. Failing to express deep concern over potential annexation is tantamount to joining these leaders in the “Committee to re-Elect Netanyahu”.

2.  Given the possible absence of a trip-wire that will indicate the imminence of a post-election annexation, it is absolutely essential to engage now – both openly and behind closed doors. 

3.  Israel’s relations with its allies are based on shared values and shared interests. Annexation will be a departure of such magnitude from those values and interests that it must not be treated as merely another example of “poor behavior” on the part of Israel. It must be made clear that that this is not a routine crisis, and that annexation will by necessity elicit non-routine consequences, in word and in deed, and at the most fundamental levels of the relationship with Israel. 

4.  The prospect of any forward movement on Israel-Palestine under Trump and Netanyahu, and without some clarity on Palestinian succession, are remote, to say the least. However, the day will come when, hopefully, it will be possible to seek ways to generate a credible political process between Israelis and Palestinians. By then, the earth will likely be so scorched that the task will be daunting. Trying to renew a political process in the face of Israeli annexation may well transform the daunting into the impossible.

5.  The commitment to international law is not merely what the European Union “does”, it is cuts to the core of what the EU is. The EU and its member states have remained committed to international law in the face of serious challenges, most prominently on the issue of Jerusalem. Annexation will therefore not only violate international law, it will put Israel in a position that directly clashes with what is the foundation of the EU’s common identity and values, challenging its cohesiveness and the coherence of its policies towards Israel, Palestine and the resolution of the conflict between them. There are indications that this is well understood in key capitals in Europe, who have already been responding to Netanyahu’s announcement accordingly.




29/2/2020 This is Not a Drill: Givat Hamatos,E-1, Har Homa and Atarot Settlement Announcements


7/2/2020 Jerusalem and the Deal of the Century


17/12/2019 Expansion of Nof Zion in the heart of Jabal Mukkaber


17/12/2019 Renewed effort to advance Atarot settlement


17/12/2019 The prospect of the approval of E-1 and the demolition of Khan al Ahmar has just become more serious


17/12/2019 Court decision suspending the sale of three church properties to the settlers


4/12/2019 The Baffling Siege of Issawiya


4/12/2019 Final approval of the Old City Aerial Cable Car plan


4/12/2019 B’selem report: A pick number of house demolitions in East Jerusalem in 2019


4/12/2019 Tensions in Temple Mount/Haram al Sharif: Cyclical, with a Difference


4/12/2019 The impact of Israel’s political crisis on potential developments in Jerusalem




6/8/2019 The Inauguration of Silwan Tunnel: Background and Ramifications


9/7/2019 Is Netanyahu Displaying Restraint? The Cases of Khan al Ahmar, Givat Hamatos and E-1


9/7/2019 Systemic collective punishment and severe clashes in Issawiya


9/7/2019 The Wadi Hummus demolitions: unlike anything witnessed to date


9/7/2019 Clashes on Temple Mount/Haram El Sharif at the end of Ramadan/Jerusalem Day


9/7/2019 Final ruling validates the lease of three properties to settlers group at the Jaffa Gate


3/4/2019 Bab al Rahme - Tensions continue


3/4/2019 Joint statement of Pope Francis and Morocco’s King Mohammed VI


3/4/2019 Political pressure to demolish Khan Al Ahmar


3/4/2019 Demolitions in Shuafat


3/4/2019 The Jerusalem municipality and Elad jointly advance the expansion of Elad’s activities in Abu Tor


3/4/2019 Opening of trade offices in Jerusalem


28/2/2019 Jerusalem & the 2019 Israeli Elections Campaign


28/1/2019 Opening of the Segregated Road in Greater Jerusalem: A Major Step Towards de facto Annexation of Area C


28/1/2019 Accelerating the Pace for Construction of E-2


28/1/2019 Imminent Eviction in Sheikh Jarrah: The Sabbagh Family


28/1/2019 The Jerusalem Aerial Cable Car: Plan Deposited for Public Review


21/12/2018 Reflections on Jerusalem, One Year After Trump Policy Shift


21/12/2018 Australia & The Perils of Recognition in Jerusalem


21/12/2018 Moving Embassies - Is Brazil Next?


21/12/2018 Bullying the World to Accept "Undivided Jerusalem" Mantra


21/12/2018 A New Jerusalem Compound for Foreign Embassies?


26/11/2018 The 2018 Jerusalem Municipal Elections: Highlights & Lessons


26/11/2018 The Closure of the U.S. Consulate in Jerusalem


26/11/2018 A Pattern of New & Troubling Developments


17/10/2018 Elections in Jerusalem 2018: The Palestinian Dimension


11/9/2018 A Final Ruling on Khan Al-Ahmar: implications and next steps


11/9/2018 US Cuts Off Funding for East Jerusalem Hospitals


11/9/2018 Jerusalem Mayor Threatens to Expel UNRWA


11/9/2018 The High Holidays: Keeping a close eye on the Temple Mount


21/8/2018 Tenders published for 603 new units in Ramat Shlomo


21/8/2018 Temple Mt/Haram al Sharif: Jewish Visits - & Tensions - Increase


21/8/2018 Israeli Govt Opens Jewish “Heritage Center” in the heart of Silwan


21/8/2018 Khan Al Ahmar Update: Recent Developments


21/8/2018 Municipality Announces New Deal for 20k units in Jerusalem


17/7/2018 Major New Plans Approved for Pisgat Ze'ev


17/7/2018 Khan al-Ahmar Demolition Postponed


17/7/2018 Renewed Visits by MKs to the Temple Mt/Haram al-Sharif


17/7/2018 Continued Settler Efforts to Increase Construction in Silwan


20/6/2018 The Trump “Peace Plan” & Jerusalem


20/6/2018 The impact [so far] of the Transfer of the US embassy to Jerusalem


20/6/2018 Updates: Khan al Ahmar, Temple Mt during Ramadan, Batan al Hawa/Silwan


3/5/2018 UNESCO’s Latest Jerusalem Resolution - Delayed & Dampened, by Consensus


29/4/2018 The Changing Status Quo on the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif - Trends & Implications


29/4/2018 US Embassy Opening - Where Things Stand & Implications


23/3/2018 The Israeli Government’s Creation of a Settler Realm in and around Jerusalem’s Old City


21/2/2018 Why Is Jerusalem Municipality Targeting UN & Churches for Taxes?


21/2/2018 The Site for the New U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem: What You Need to Know (So Far)


21/2/2018 A New Neighborhood to Expand the Footprint of the settlement of Gilo


21/2/2018 New Checkpoint Cuts off Al-Walajeh from Lands & Spring


19/1/2018 Trump’s Jerusalem Decision & Its Aftermath


19/1/2018 New Law to Prevent Future Compromise on Jerusalem


19/1/2018 Pressure Mounts to Advance Greater Jerusalem bill


19/1/2018 New bill to Revoke Residency of Jerusalem Palestinians


19/1/2018 Another JNF-Linked Eviction Looms in Silwan


19/1/2018 Disney-fication proceeds: Jerusalem Cable Car and Footbridge


19/1/2018 New Jerusalem “Trump Train Station”?


19/1/2018 Demolitions in East Jerusalem


19/1/2018 More Jews Going to the Temple Mount/Haram al Sharif


14/12/2017 Trump's New Jerusalem Policy: Early Assessment


13/12/2017 Will Jerusalem Recognition Beget Sustained, Serious Violence? Too Soon to Say.


13/12/2017 Amendment to Jerusalem Basic Law Moves Forward


13/12/2017 Planned Demolitions in Kafr Aqab


13/12/2017 Historic Basin Cable Car Project Advances


13/12/2017 Another Jerusalem-Area Bedouin Community Under Threat


13/12/2017 Tightening the Noose Around Walajeh


30/10/2017 Bibi Blinks on Greater Jerusalem Bill; July 1 - Oct 30 EJ Settlements Chronology


3/10/2017 Imminent Threat: Green Light for Givat Hamatos


3/10/2017 Imminent Threat: Potential War Crime; de facto Annexation and New Settlement Construction (Ma’ale Adumim/E-1)


3/10/2017 Uptick is Settlement Displacements: Shamasneh Family Evicted


3/10/2017 Expansion of Nof Zion on the Agenda


10/8/2017 Netanyahu Unshackled: New and dangerous terms of engagement in Jerusalem


10/8/2017 The Latest Temple Mt/Haram al-Sharif Crisis: A Provisional Post-Mortem


10/8/2017 Pending Jerusalem Legislative Initiatives: Strategic Shifts in Current Status & Potential Political Future of Jerusalem


10/8/2017 East Jerusalem Settlements -- APPROVED


21/7/2017 Major New Crisis on the Temple Mount/Haram al Sharif


21/7/2017 New Life for Major Settlement Plan to Connect Adam (West Bank) to EJ's Neve Yaacov


21/7/2017 Proposed Amendment of Jerusalem Basic Law


21/7/2017 UNESCO’s Resolution on Hebron


5/7/2017 The Settlement Floodgates Have Been Opened


5/6/2017 Trump Signs Waiver, Postponing Embassy Move


5/6/2017 Trump Visit & Jerusalem Day: Before, During, & After


5/6/2017 Cabinet Approves Projects for Old City, Historic Basin, & East Jerusalem (Inside the Barrier)


5/6/2017 Jordan's Growing Discontent with Israeli Provocations Over the Temple Mount/al-Haram al-Sharif


5/6/2017 Danny Seidemann in Haaretz: Trump Exposed the Fantasy of Netanyahu's 'Undivided Jerusalem'


5/5/2017 URGENT/BREAKING NEWS: Imminent Tenders for Givat Hamatos


5/5/2017 Imminent Announcements: Atarot & Ramat Shlomo


5/5/2017 New Settler “Visitors’ Center” in Ras El Amud


5/5/2017 The New UNESCO Resolution & Jerusalem


28/3/2017 Working Toward a New US-Israel Understanding on Settlements


28/3/2017 Tensions Growing [again] Focused on Temple Mount/Haram al Sharif


28/3/2017 Palestinian Residency Rights: Important Court Ruling


24/2/2017 Limiting Settlement Construction to the "Blocs" - Implications for Jerusalem


24/2/2017 To Move, or Not to Move (the Embassy), That is the Question


24/2/2017 Paving the way for annexation?


24/2/2017 Work Starting on Eastern Ring Road?


24/1/2017 East Jerusalem Settlement Activity & the Onset of the Trump Era: What to Watch


5/1/2017 Moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem: A Hard Look at the Arguments & Implications


14/12/2016 Update on Israeli Govt-Proposed Law to Muzzle Muslim Call to Prayer


14/12/2016 Rumors & Lobbying Around Possible US Embassy Relocation to Jerusalem


14/12/2016 Netanyahu Rejects Police Recommendations to Tweak Temple Mt Status Quo


14/12/2016 Batan al-Hawa - New B'tselem Report on Settler Activities


14/12/2016 Final Approval of Gilo Expansion - 770 New Units (Mordot Gilo South)


30/11/2016 Insights/analysis on UNESCO resolutions on the Old City & its Walls


30/11/2016 Re: Reported Demolitions at Jerusalem's Bab Al-Rahma Cemetery


30/11/2016 Plan to Connect Tel Aviv to the Western Wall


30/11/2016 2016 Jewish High Holidays: Record number of Jewish visitors on Temple Mount/Haram El Sharif


28/11/2016 The American Role: Interregnum & Post-January 20, 2016


28/11/2016 Ban on Mosque Morning Call to Prayer


28/11/2016 Turning Jeruasalem Palestinians into “Human Shields” Against Outpost Evacuations


28/11/2016 Announcement of Construction Plan in Mordot Gilo


28/11/2016 OCHA report: 180 Palestinian households at risks of eviction in East Jerusalem


28/11/2016 Approval of 500 units in Ramat Shlomo


28/11/2016 State Comptroller’s Report on Elad


30/9/2016 On the Eve of the New Year – A Different & Dangerous Jerusalem


15/8/2016 Government Actively Advancing E-2


15/8/2016 Back in the Headlines: Plans for 2500 Units South of Gilo


15/8/2016 Tisha B'Av Incitement Re: The Temple Mount


15/8/2016 Deepening the Occupation in East Jerusalem


5/8/2016 Settlement Announcements - July 2016


5/8/2016 The Uptick in East Jerusalem Demolitions


5/8/2016 Israeli Govt: "The Mt of Olives will be Reinforced as a Visitors' Site"


5/8/2016 Ma'ale Adumim Annexation bill


8/7/2016 Full Analysis of the Latest East Jerusalem Announcements/Approvals


28/6/2016 A new settlement enclave in Silwan – Batan al Hawa


28/6/2016 ?The end of quiet on the Temple Mount/Haram al Sharif


28/6/2016 The Wrong Way to Divide Jerusalem


3/6/2016 Proposed Annexation of Maale Adumim


3/6/2016 East Jerusalem: Emerging Patterns


2/6/2016 Keeping a Close Eye on the Temple Mount/Haram al Sharif


22/1/2016 Church Attacked (Again) in Jerusalem


22/1/2016 Herzog proposes De-Annexing Some Parts of East Jerusalem


30/12/2015 Revealed in Newly-Released Documents: Massive Planning Advancing for Settlements


29/12/2015 Understanding "Status Quo" on the Temple Mount/Haram al Sharif


9/11/2015 What's Been Going On in Jerusalem? Danny Seidemann Analysis


9/11/2015 What's Going On? Senior IDF Officials Weigh In.


9/11/2015 Recent East Jerusalem Settlement Developments


9/11/2015 East Jerusalem Security Situation - by the numbers


9/11/2015 EJ Security Situation - Plans to Revoke Palestinians' Residency?


9/11/2015 EJ Security Situation - Security Measures on the Ground


9/11/2015 EJ Security Situation - Home Demolitions


22/9/2015 Jerusalem & the Temple Mount: A New Dangerous Escalation


13/8/2015 Imminent New Settlement Enclave in Silwan


13/8/2015 E. Jerusalem (partial) Settlement Freeze May Soon Defrost


13/8/2015 Troubling Developments on the Temple Mount/Haram al Sharif


22/5/2015 What We Can Learn from Jerusalem Day 2015


22/5/2015 Latest Settlement Tenders in East Jerusalem - Ramat Shlomo & Givat Zeev


22/5/2015 ?E-1 Looming


22/5/2015 East Jerusalem Simmers


29/4/2015 New & Recycled East Jerusalem Settlement Tenders


29/4/2015 High Court Rules on Absentee Property Law in Jerusalem


29/4/2015 Good News: IDF Colleges NOT Moving to Mount of Olives; Holy Basin Cable Car Plan Stalled


29/4/2015 Approval (but only sort of) of New Palestinian Construction in East Jerusalem


29/4/2015 Some Palestinian Cars Allowed in East Jerusalem


29/4/2015 Palestinian Security Forces (not really) allowed in East Jerusalem


14/1/2015 East Jerusalem at the Beginning of 2015: Things to Watch


3/11/2014 Attempted Assassination Raises the Stakes at the Temple Mount


3/11/2014 Reasons Behind Escalating Temple Mount Crisis


3/11/2014 Bibi's New Settlement Initiative - Ramat Shlomo & Har Homa


3/11/2014 More Settler Takeovers in Another Part of Silwan


2/10/2014 Netanyahu Cannot Evade Responsibility for Givat Hamatos Approval & Silwan Takeovers


1/10/2014 Breaking & Urgent News: Givat Hamatos Approved


30/9/2014 Major Development: In Overnight Operation, Settlers Take Over Multiple Buildings in Silwan


18/9/2014 Specter of E-1 Raised by Plan to Relocate Bedouin


18/9/2014 Looming Crisis in East Jerusalem - Givat Hamatos


17/9/2014 East Jerusalem Clashes Continue


9/9/2014 East Jerusalem Aflame


4/9/2014 The Real Story about those new units "approved" for Palestinians in East Jerusalem


26/8/2014 Gilo Tenders Awarded, but (for now) EJ Settlement Freeze Continues


19/5/2014 Jerusalem Settlements - The (Proximate, Contributing) Cause of the Collapse


19/5/2014 Post-Collapse - De Facto Freeze in East Jerusalem, But the Lull Won’t Last


19/5/2014 Are We Sliding Toward Religious War? A Brief Survey of Key Jerusalem Developments/Trends


5/3/2014 Framework Language and Jerusalem: Gimmicks Are NOT the Answer


5/3/2014 New Israeli Yeshiva Downtown Sheikh Jarrah


5/3/2014 Playing with Fire, Part 2: Elad Set to Gain Control of Area Adjacent to the Temple Mt/Haram al Sharif


5/3/2014 Playing with Fire, Part 1: Debating the Status Quo on the Temple Mount


3/3/2014 Demolition orders in E-1


9/1/2014 New Seidemann Op-Ed in the Guardian: The myth of an undivided Jerusalem is collapsing under its own weight


12/12/2013 Danny Seidemann Injured by Stone-Thrower - Condition Update & Comment


12/12/2013 East Jerusalem Settlements since the Resumption of Talks: the Facts & their Implications


12/12/2013 The [Apparent] Re-Emergence of the “Greater Jerusalem” Gimmick


12/12/2013 Post-Script: Those Planning Tenders for 24,000 New Settlement Units


27/8/2013 Ramat Shlomo Back in the Headlines


27/8/2013 Funding Approved for Settler-Run Projects in Silwan and Jebel Mukabber


27/8/2013 Three Palestinians Killed by Israeli Forces in Qalandia RC


27/8/2013 ?Uptick in East Jerusalem Home Demolitions


19/8/2013 Pyromaniacs Target the Temple Mount


19/8/2013 Jerusalem Residency Concerns Resurface


19/8/2013 New Pro-Settlement Guidelines on Absentee Property Law


19/8/2013 A U.S. Court Rules on Jerusalem


16/8/2013 Timeline/details of Recent Jerusalem-Related Settlement Developments


16/8/2013 Bibi, Settlements & Peace Talks -- Analysis


13/6/2013 The A-Zayyem/Mount of Olives Interchange, Plan 14049


13/6/2013 Tenders Awarded for Ramot Expansion, Additional Tenders for Mordot Gilo


13/6/2013 Everything You Need to Know About Jerusalem & the Absentee Property Law


7/5/2013 The IDF Colleges on the Mt. of Olives Off the Agenda, Again


7/5/2013 Plans Published for Old City Cable Car


7/5/2013 Sharansky Plan Hits a Wall, no pun intended


7/5/2013 The Wall/Barrier vs. Cremisan & Beit Jala


5/5/2013 Spatial Shaping in J'lem Continues with Opening of Route 20


24/4/2013 Concerns about Proposed “Solution” to Women’s Prayer Issue at the Western Wall


22/4/2013 The Politics of Waste Treatment in East Jerusalem


15/4/2013 Fifty New Units in East Talpiot


14/1/2013 E-1/Bab ash-Shams: What Happened, What it Means, What Next


28/12/2012 Mordot Gilo South - APPROVED


19/12/2012 Givat Hamatos APPROVED - What it Means


17/12/2012 Breaking News - Approvals this week - Ramat Shlomo & Givat Hamatos


5/12/2012 The E-1 Crisis...This Is Not a Drill


6/11/2012 More than 1200 New Tenders Issued for Pisgat Ze'ev and Ramot


31/10/2012 New Construction Approved in Har Homa


30/10/2012 New East Jerusalem Settlement Construction Approved - East Talpiot units for Israeli Security Personnel


24/10/2012 Mordot Gilo Construction Approved


24/10/2012 Plans for IDF Colleges on Mt. of Olives Deposited for Public Review & Explanation of Location


24/10/2012 Taking the Garbage to East Jerusalem


24/10/2012 Is the Palestinian Population of East Jerusalem Becoming More Israeli -- No


24/10/2012 Pisgat Zeev in the News


18/10/2012 Crisis Brewing on the Temple Mount


17/9/2012 Jerusalem, Netanyahu and the two-state solution


16/9/2012 Issue to watch: East Jerusalem Home Demolitions


16/9/2012 Attacks on Palestinians in Jerusalem – Sign of the “Hebronization” of the City


16/9/2012 Jerusalem in the Headlines: Ras al-Amud, Temple Mount, the Barrier, Elad, & Har Homa


15/9/2012 Jerusalem: Political Football in U.S. Presidential Race


14/9/2012 In Memorium: Our Friend, Chris Stevens


2/7/2012 New Tenders Published for East Jerusalem Settlement Construction


2/7/2012 Plans for New IDF War College on the Mt. of Olives Approved for Public Review


11/6/2012 Settlement Surge Continues on Jerusalem's Southern Flank


8/5/2012 Arab VIPs Start Coming to Jerusalem


7/5/2012 Givat Hamatos – Nearing the Point-of-No-Return


7/5/2012 IDF College on the Mt. of Olives – Moving Forward


7/5/2012 Kidmat Tzion – Municipal Approval Anticipated Soon


7/5/2012 Mughrabi Ramp – Some Good News


6/5/2012 Beit Hanina Settlement Effort Continues


10/4/2012 Late Winter Freeze in East Jerusalem turns to Spring Thaw


8/4/2012 Kidmat Tziyon Settlement Scheme to be Expedited


8/4/2012 New East Jerusalem “Park” Soon to get Final Approval


8/4/2012 New Settlement in Beit Hanina?


8/4/2012 Israeli High Court Rejects Shepherd’s Hotel Appeal


14/3/2012 Will Arab & Muslim Leaders Start Coming to Jerusalem?


14/3/2012 A Major East Jerusalem Settlement Plan Comes Back to Life


14/3/2012 Spotlight on Jewish Access to the Temple Mount


14/3/2012 Volatility in Silwan: Mini-Intifada Continues, Cave-Ins, and New Settler Plans


9/1/2012 The Ongoing Settlement Surge in East Jerusalem


9/1/2012 The Mughrabi Gate Saga - Update


10/12/2011 Barkat Tries to Force Mughrabi Ramp Demolition


9/12/2011 Approval of Mount Scopus "Park" Proceeds


13/10/2011 Approval for New Israeli Settlement at Givat Hamatos Proceeds


12/10/2011 New Pisgat Ze'ev Building Permits


28/9/2011 New Settlement Approval issued for Gilo - Plan 13261


11/8/2011 More Jerusalem Settlement Approvals: Ramat Shlomo, Pisgat Zeev, Givat Hamatos


10/8/2011 Yet Another Har Homa Plan Approved (No. 12825) - Public Buildings, 50 Units


5/8/2011 Har Homa C Plan 10310 (app. 983 units) Approved


9/7/2011 Jerusalem Municipal "Approval" of Mordot Gilo Plan


9/7/2011 Meretz Rejoins Municipal Coalition - Separate Portfolios for EJ Settlers and Palestinians


20/6/2011 The Ramat Shlomo House Extension Plans


10/6/2011 Committee for Acceleration of (EJ) Construction to Convene on June 14


24/5/2011 Netanyahu Approves East Jerusalem Construction Hours Before Obama Address


24/5/2011 Barkat Trying to Force Netanyahu's Hand on Mughrabi Ramp


12/5/2011 The Non-Existent Court Decision on Bustan Demolitions


10/5/2011 New East Jerusalem Settlements Update


9/5/2011 US Supreme Court to Hear Jerusalem Status Case


21/4/2011 Is There a De Facto Settlement Freeze in East Jerusalem? The Facts


18/4/2011 April Surge in East Jerusalem Construction Plans


18/4/2011 Mount Scopus Slopes Park Approved for Public Review


16/3/2011 Permit Issued for 14 Units at Ras el Amud Police Station


16/3/2011 Permit Issued for Mughrabi Ramp


17/10/2018 Jerusalem Elections 2018 - the Palestinian Dimension


29/7/2013 A Layman's Guide to Jerusalem House Demolitions
Daniel Seidemann


29/7/2013 A Laymen's Guide to the Planning Process in Jerusalem.pdf
Daniel Seidmann


20/3/2013 "Spatial Shaping", the Ross Agenda and a Partial Settlement Freeze
Daniel Seidmann


10/3/2013 Spatial Shaping - Unilaterally Determining Israel’s Base-Line Border
Daniel Seidmann


10/9/2012 NOREF Policy Brief August 2012 | By Daniel Seidemann
Daniel Seidemann


30/1/2012 East Jerusalem and the Imminent Demise of the Two-State Solution
Daniel Seidemann


7/11/2011 East Jerusalem Developments and Trends: 2006-2011
Daniel Seidemann


31/10/2011 The TJ Guide to the Planning and Construction Process in East Jerusalem - Oct. 2011
Daniel Seidemann


15/10/2011 Givat Hamatos/Mordot Gilo: New Settlement Schemes on Jerusalem's Southern Flank
Daniel Seidemann


12/8/2011 U.S. (non)-Recognition of Sovereignty in Jerusalem: A Consistent Policy, 1948 - 2011
Lara Friedman


1/8/2011 Hanging On By Our Fingernails
Daniel Seidemann


22/2/2011 Jerusalem Challenges the API
Daniel Seidemann


21/2/2011 East Jerusalem settlers and Israel's never-ending War of Independence
Daniel Seidemann


20/2/2011 The Two Jerusalems
D. Seidemann D.Rothem


19/2/2011 Jerusalem on the Brink
Daniel Seidemann


19/2/2011 A barely tolerated minority
Daniel Seidemann


17/2/2011 Redeeming Jerusalem by truth, not hollow slogans
Daniel Seidemann


16/2/2011 Jerusalem, settlements, and the "everybody knows" fallacy
Lara Friedman - Daniel Seidemann


15/2/2011 Blogposts
Lara Friedman